Plagiarismdetector.net Review 2024:
I Tried it for 14 days, Here's
What I Found [3 Pros, 5 Cons]

• Plagiarismdetector.net Review Summary
• 3 Things Plagiarismdetector.net Does Well
• 5 Big Mistakes Plagiarismdetector.net Makes
• What Does Plagiarismdetector.net Cost?
• What are some Plagiarismdetector.net alternatives?
• Is Plagiarismdetector.net Legit? - The Final Verdict

Plagiarismdetector.net Review Summary

3 Things Plagiarismdetector.net Does Well

• File type flexibility: You’re not stuck with just one type of file here, since it lets you check stuff in .doc, .docx, .pdf, or .txt, and that means less hassle with file conversions.
 
• Check by URL: So, you know how copying and pasting text for a plagiarism check can be a pain? With this, you just pop in the web link and it scans your whole post for you.
 
• Detailed report generation: After a plagiarism check, you get a report that shows what’s copied and where it came from, so it’s pretty easy for you to see what’s happening with your writing.
 
• More on the shiny side of Plagiarismdetector.net below.

5 Worst Things About Plagiarismdetector.net

• Terrible Customer Service: If you ever want a refund or try to cancel, get ready to pull your hair out. They make it super hard and rarely respond, so you're stuck waiting for answers that never come.
 
• Expensive Subscriptions Trap You: You have to pay for credits every month, but if you don’t use them, they disappear. That means you’re basically just throwing away your money if you don’t use up all the credits.
 
• Accuracy is All Over the Place: Sometimes it misses giant chunks of copied text. Other times it says your text is original when you know it isn’t. So, you can't really trust the results you’re getting.
 
• Way Too Many Annoying Ads: There are ads everywhere on the website. You have to keep closing stuff just to use the tool, and honestly, it gets really annoying really fast.
 
• Can’t Catch Tricky Plagiarism: This checker is super basic and only finds exact matches. It can't catch people who rephrase stuff or use sneaky tricks to hide copied content, so a lot slips right through.
 

How Much Does Plagiarismdetector.net Cost?

• Basic Plan (Student) – So, for $20 a month, you get to check 200 pages plus an extra 40 (that's 240 total), which turns out to be 72,000 words. Honestly, I think it’s enough for small assignments, but it doesn’t let you add extra users or have API access, and the credits can run out fast if you’ve got lots to check.
 
• Recommended Plan (Institute) – This one's $50 a month, and you get 560 pages, plus 140 more (so, 700 pages and 210,000 words). You can even add four user seats, which is cool if you’re working in a group. API access is included, which makes things a bit smoother if you want more control. Plus, they say you'll save about 29% compared to buying smaller plans, but honestly, $50 a month is still pretty steep for some folks.
 
• Custom Plan – There’s also this custom plan thing, but you gotta reach out and ask for a setup based on what you really need. It might be handy if the other plans don’t quite fit, but honestly, I wish the details were clearer upfront so you wouldn’t have to wait around for a quote.
 
• Should you buy Plagiarismdetector.net? Personally, I’d say no, because those credits run out each month, and if you don’t use them, they’re gone. Feels a bit limiting for the price.

Plagiarismdetector.net Review - What Do People Actually Like?

1. File type flexibility:
   • You can upload .doc, .docx, .pdf, or .txt files, so no fuss with changing your file formats.
    
   • If your work is on Dropbox or cloud storage, you just grab it straight from there instead of moving it around first.
    
   • People find it useful that you don’t have to hunt through a bunch of options for simple uploads.
 
2. Check by URL:
   • You just put in a webpage link and it checks the entire content for plagiarism; no need to copy-paste text.
    
   • Bloggers say this really saves them time when checking their published posts.
    
   • It works right away as soon as you add the link, so you spend less time waiting around.
 
3. Detailed report generation:
   • The report points out what parts might be copied and tells you exactly where it found the matches.
    
   • It works even with content in other languages, so you’re not stuck checking only English stuff.
    
   • Some people use these reports to take action, like making a copyright complaint if someone steals their work.

“Finally, a plagiarism detector that works with all popular types of text files. Whether I want to check plagiarism in a .doc, .docx, .pdf, or .txt file, I can do all that without requiring any file conversions. Furthermore, the flexibility to access files from both local and cloud storage has been quite helpful for me.” ― Cecilia

5 Worst Things About Plagiarismdetector.net

• Terrible Customer Service
  • When you try to get help, you're stuck waiting forever for a reply. No one gets back to you quickly, which just makes you feel completely ignored when you actually need support.
   
  • If you ever look for a refund or try to cancel, it's a nightmare. They make you go through hoops, and half the time you never even get your money back, so you're just left frustrated.
   
  • Honestly, based on dealing with their support myself, I can say you get automated, copy-paste replies that don't even answer your real question. It’s not just me—lots of users complain about this, too.
 
• Expensive Subscriptions Trap You
  • This site makes you pay every month for credits, even if you don’t use them. The worst part is, any credits you don’t use vanish at the end of the month, so your money just goes down the drain.
   
  • You can't save up your unused credits for later, and that means you end up wasting money if you're not using the tool all the time. That’s really annoying for anyone who only checks sometimes.
   
  • I’ve found that the subscriptions push you to use all your credits in a rush before they expire. It’s like they designed it so you’ll lose out and feel forced to pay again for what you already bought.
 
Here's a review by ALAN talking about the issues with ads and accuracy:
 

“Too many ads on the way and not accurate too many ads on the way, not very accurate, for sure you have more plagiarism of what it says.” ― ALAN

 
• Accuracy is All Over the Place
  • This tool messes up a lot by not catching big chunks of copied text, so you can't really trust what the checker tells you. You might think your stuff is clean, but it's not always right.
   
  • I've tested it myself with obvious copied text, and sometimes it says it's all original. That sort of random result makes you doubt if the tool is even working most of the time.
   
  • Reviews say some content from places like Wikipedia and research papers go undetected as plagiarism, which defeats the whole point of using this site in the first place.
 
• Way Too Many Annoying Ads
  • When you use the website, you get bombarded with ads on every single page. It slows you down and honestly just makes the experience super irritating really quickly.
   
  • You keep having to click and close endless ad pop-ups, which ruins your focus. It just feels like they're more interested in showing ads than actually helping you check for plagiarism.
   
  • I’ve noticed that the number of ads can make the tool almost unusable, especially when you’re in a hurry or just want to get your check done fast without all the interruptions.
 
• Can’t Catch Tricky Plagiarism
  • This tool only finds exact text matches, so anyone who changes just a few words or rephrases stuff will sneak right past the checker easily. That means it’s missing a lot of copied content.
   
  • It only checks basic matches and searches on Bing, so all those smart or sneaky ways people copy stuff don’t even get flagged. Other tools out there do way better at catching this stuff.
   
  • Honestly, if you want to catch more than just simple copying, this tool can’t help you. It’s too basic for anyone who really cares about thorough plagiarism checking.
 
Here's a review by originality.ai talking about their tool detecting capabilities:
 

“The scanner cannot detect advanced instances of plagiarism such as paraphrasing, patchwork plagiarism or other more nuanced examples of plagiarism.” ― originality.ai

 

What Does Plagiarismdetector.net Cost?

• You pay $20 every month, and that only gives you 240 pages or 72,000 words per month. That's not much if you actually write a lot or do school work all the time!
 
• It works out to $1 for every 3,600 words, which honestly feels like I’m getting squeezed for every penny when you start doing the math.
 
• There’s no API access either, which means you can't automate stuff or use it with other tools if you're into that. That's a huge pain if you want things simple and quick.
 
• And here's the kicker—those credits vanish every month. If you don't use them, they're gone. You never get to roll them over, so it feels like they punish you for not writing enough one month, but still take your money!
 
• I also checked, and you don’t even get extra user seats to share it or split costs, so it's just you footing the whole bill.

• This plan bumps you up to 700 pages or 210,000 words every month, but you’re also paying $50 every single month — that’s a lot, even for a small group.
 
• The rate here is a little better — about $1 for every 4,200 words — but that's still not cheap. It only looks affordable because they say you save 29%, but really, it’s still a steep monthly fee.
 
• You do get API access and 4 user seats, so it's a bit more flexible if you’re at a school or running a team. But, again, those unused credits disappear every month.
 
• In my experience, unless you're grinding through pages every single week, most people never even use up all those words, and you end up throwing that money away.
 
• For $50/month, I really expected more — like at least letting me keep my unused words. But nope, they’re gone at the end of the month.

• They say you can ask for a Custom Plan, where you might get “flexible configuration." But there's no clear info upfront about what it costs or what you actually get. So, you have to contact them and wait for a quote—feels annoying and slow, especially if you just want to get started.
 
• From what I've seen, custom plans usually end up costing even more, especially if you want extra seats or loads of words.
 
• Honestly, it seems like they’re hoping people will just pay a lot to skip the hassle, but if you’re on a budget, this isn’t the way to go.

• The refund policy isn’t clearly mentioned anywhere. I had to dig through their site and still couldn't find anything solid about it. Kinda sketchy, in my opinion.
 
• You can probably cancel from your dashboard, but they don’t say if you’ll get money back if you cancel partway through the month. So, you might just be stuck paying for a month you don’t even use.

• You’re paying every month for credits, and if you don’t use them, they just disappear. It’s like throwing money out the window.
 
• For me, after using it myself, it just feels pretty expensive, especially if you aren’t constantly checking huge documents.
 
• I hate monthly subscriptions for this stuff because it’s always the same — you pay, and most months you don’t even use what you paid for.

• Way cheaper! You can start for just $5 — and that’s not $5/month, that’s $5 one time, no strings attached. Check out the full details here.
 
• Your credits never expire. Buy what you need, use them as slowly as you want — no stress about losing what you paid for.
 
• You get both plagiarism checking and AI detection/humanization tools all in one place. That saves money and hassle, for real.
 
• Even if you only have a few documents to check each month, you never waste your money, and nobody’s forcing you into a monthly subscription.
 
• If you want to see how it stacks up vs Plagiarismdetector.net, just scroll to my comparison section below.

What are some Plagiarismdetector.net alternatives?

#1 - Plagiarismdetector.net vs AIDetectPlus

• Both of these checkers claim to help you sniff out copied content, but honestly, they work very differently.
  • Plagiarismdetector.net has a few nice features like checking different file types—Word docs, PDFs, you name it. You can even pop in a link instead of pasting your text, which is pretty handy. And after running the scan, you get a report that actually tells you what’s copied and from where.
   
  • AIDetectPlus, though, is totally built for people tired of getting tricked by basic plagiarism checkers. It does AI detection, plagiarism checking, AND it can even humanize or fix your content so it passes checks—all at once! It’s made for everyday users like students and writers, not just big schools or offices.
 
• Where is Plagiarismdetector.net Better?
  • It works with a bunch of file types and lets you check by URL, so you don’t need to mess with copying and pasting.
 
• Where is AIDetectPlus Better?
  • No annoying ads, unlike Plagiarismdetector.net, which kind of feels like a pop-up carnival sometimes.
   
  • You never lose your credits—buy them once and use them whenever you want. With Plagiarismdetector.net, your credits vanish every month if you don't use them, which really stinks.
   
  • Way more accurate! AIDetectPlus actually catches stuff that’s reworded or disguised—not just the obvious copy-paste jobs.
   
  • Built-in tools for AI detection (AI Detector) and even a humanizer to rewrite text better. All in one spot.
   
  • Super helpful support—if you get stuck, you actually get a fast reply (can’t say the same for Plagiarismdetector.net, honestly).
   
  • Tools for everyone—from students to marketers to teachers—so it fits whatever you need, not just the basics.

#2 - Plagiarismdetector.net vs Turnitin

• Alright, both Plagiarismdetector.net and Turnitin are made to catch plagiarism, but they’re worlds apart in how they go about it.
  • Plagiarismdetector.net is more do-it-yourself—super easy if you just want a quick check and like to upload different kinds of files or even check by popping in a link.
  • Turnitin is more school-style. It's made for teachers, students, and big classrooms, with loads of fancy features and in-depth reports.
 
• Where is Turnitin Better?
  • Turnitin is perfect for teachers and schools. It digs deep and checks against massive databases, and it even finds sneaky plagiarism tricks. Plus, if you’ve ever had to handle huge class assignments, Turnitin makes that a breeze.
   
  • It also works right inside school websites and helps keep track of everything—so for big groups or official stuff, I’d say Turnitin wins.
 
• Where is Plagiarismdetector.net Better? It’s simple, fast, and lets you upload almost any file or just put in a link to check your work. If you only need to check a few papers or want something easy to use by yourself, it does the job.

#3 - Plagiarismdetector.net vs Duplichecker

• Both Plagiarismdetector.net and Duplichecker are online plagiarism checkers, but they’re not really for the same kind of person.
  • Duplichecker is super easy, free, and quick—if you just want to copy-paste something to see if it’s original, no account or anything, it works fine for that.
  • Plagiarismdetector.net is more for folks who have bigger files or need to upload stuff in different formats, or maybe want a full report that breaks things down.
 
• Where is Duplichecker Better?
  • It’s totally free, no strings attached. I like that you don’t even need to sign up. You just paste your text or upload a file and go. If you just want to quickly see if something’s copied, Duplichecker is honestly the hassle-free way to do it.
   
  • It’s faster, has no annoying monthly credit thing, and not overloaded with fancy options that confuse you.
 
• Where is Plagiarismdetector.net Better? If you need to upload different kinds of files, or you want a detailed report showing what you copied and from where, Plagiarismdetector.net might make it a little easier.

Is Plagiarismdetector.net Legit?

• Reason #1: Customer Service is Awful: If you ever need to cancel or get a refund, good luck. I waited forever and barely got any replies. It feels like shouting into a void.
 
• Reason #2: Expensive Subscriptions That Waste Money: You pay for credits every month, but if you don’t use them, poof, they're gone. No rollover, no mercy. I lost out on my own credits way too many times.
 
• Reason #3: Accuracy is Super Unreliable: Sometimes it misses obvious plagiarism. Other times it clears stuff that is definitely not original. So, honestly, you never know if you can trust the results.

“Only checks for Websites and open access. I have copied the first paragraph of Wikipedia on plagiarism and it detected only 89% of the text to be copied. Another text, copied from a scientific paper was found to be 100% my work. Does not do the job properly!” ― Markus (AU)

• #1 Actually Smart Plagiarism Scans: The checker goes through billions of sources, finds exact matches, and shows you the proof right there. It’s fast, accurate, and you can actually fix your writing right away.
 
• #2 Credits NEVER Disappear: If you buy credits, they’re yours forever. Use them whenever. No more stressing about stuff vanishing at the end of the month.
 
• #3 Support That Actually Helps: Real people reply to you fast (within 12 hours or less). No ghosting, no confusing chatbots, just answers.
 
• #4 Tools for What You Need: Whether you're a student, teacher, or blogger, AIDetectPlus gives you exactly what you need. Just pick your tool from the menu up top!